Quote:
Originally Posted by KDCat
"Completely integrate" = AA women rush and are bid in numbers representative of their percentage of the campus population. My previous point about that was that I think it's better to look at total percentages of AA women served by both NPC sororities and by historically AA sororities and multicultural societies.
|
I don't anticipate that AA girls will participate in NPC recruitment at numbers approaching those, in the near future anyway. As it is, there are fewer than 100 (far fewer in spring) total members of the NPHC sororities on campus.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KDCat
Please don't bag on AKA. When white students present themselves as PNMS and are being excluded from AKA because of their race, AKA can deal with that problem then. In this case, NPC sororities at Alabama excluded AA PNMs because of their skin color. That's not fair. That's not in compliance with our current membership selection standards. We need to get into compliance with our own standards.
NOT being in compliance with our own standards is what caused this problem. If one particular AA PNM talked some stuff about our chapters, we pretty much had it coming for not living up to the standards we have set for ourselves.
|
I wasn't criticizing AKA. I was criticizing Miss Patterson's disparaging assumptions.
On the other hand, you seem to be implying that your chapter at Bama excluded the 2 (?) AA PNMs because of their skin color. How do you know this? Were you privy to their membership selection?