Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
If only we could preach the "don't pass judgment" and "this is news?" thing in every GC thread. There would be few discussions of any topic and that includes threads about alleged pledging and hazing incidents. I guess it's okay to "pass judgment" for some topics for which we have limited knowledge and not for other topics for which we have limited knowledge.
/rant
|
This is what I was getting at. I'm pretty sure the majority of "news" posts on GC follow:
1) Here's a news article
2) First impressions, but we'll wait until the courts sort it out
3) Courts said x, y, z
4) Additional opinions based on x, y, z
None of those seem to be a big issue. Not being argumentative, but I don't know why this one is different.
ETA:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
I think Kevin's point is the problem of passing judgment on the people involved as if we know everything there is to know about the situation when we don't.
|
Cool. So when new members post and we jump to "It sounds like you're not being completely truthful. You sound like a spoiled brat who doesn't know how to accept a bid from people who like you. You're a terrible person," that's OK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
First, I'm a lawyer, not a judge, so I don't pass judgment on people, I try to get someone else to. Technicalities matter! Second, when I do this, I know as much, if not more than anyone involved and I am in a very good place to be making recommendations to the Court based on my research and knowledge of the law and knowledge of the facts, neither of which anyone has command of here. You took some snarky editorialized Fox Newsish piece and piled on.
And... this is news? Really?
|
We didn't make it news, but come on -- you know that in our current news cycle, even small things become national stories. I'm still not understanding why THIS story seems to affect you like this.
And touche re: the lawyer/judge thing
