Quote:
Originally Posted by CookiesNCream
Yes, I see what you're saying. And saying that IU needs to move to total is like beating a dead horse over and over again.
No one ever said that those chapters have to bear the burden of taking more members than they can "comfortably accomodate." Why should ASA only have to take 45 girls when other housed chapters are forced to take more than that? They don't need to worry about issues that housed chapters do, such as not having enough beds, parking spots, food, or a comfortable living space (we already sleep in cold dorms and share rooms with 2+ people in order to fit as many people into the houses as possible). HUNDREDS of women are going unmatched this year so that chapters that originally colonized in order to give more women the opportunity to go greek can suddenly drastically reduce their quotas? That doesn't sound right to me.
Also I'm not sure why you put unhoused in quotes when that's what those chapters are. Do you want me to call them "off-campus" like many other people do? Because that's obviously incorrect terminology.
|
There is more to the issue than that. Why even have ASA and TPA participate in recruitment? We'll just round up all the reject girls, divide by two and dump them all in one of the unhoused groups. Why should they get a say in the matter? It's not like they have beds to fill or anything? Do you see why that sounds ridiculous?