|
I can see the point of ranking specific, objective things - GPAs among chapters, endowment among nationals, number of members, number of chapters, etc. You could even get more subjective and rank, say, housing. (Chapter A has the biggest, Chapter B doesn't have a house, Chapter C's is small).
But how do you rank the more subjective "best"? I know a chapter that has a lot of members, great grades, everything seemingly going for it. The other chapters can't stand them - and it's not jealousy; they like the other chapter with the numbers and grades and leaders. But this one house has a bad reputation for dirty rushing (deserved), being snobs, and bad-mouthing the other chapters. How do you rank something like that?
__________________
Alpha Xi Delta
|