Quote:
Originally posted by Cardiac
I pointed out 2 books earlier if you read my post. If you want me to point out and name every book I have read or articles I have seen that is impossible cause I honestly don't remember. But if you generally would like to know more than what people teach and tell you then go to the library yourself. Or maybe you just want to have something to say.
I can tell you where i have gained some of my knowledge from: Classes. History of Ancient Civilizations, the African Influece, Ancient Greece, Mythology, Urban Anthropology, Cultural Anthrology, African American Culture (remarkably only a 1 credit course and only half a sememster long, a travisty).......I have also read almost every article that I had the oppurtunity to see that had something to do with African American Life and Africa. (that is one of my major) Criminology, The Middle east Tradition. ( a 400 level course no longer offered because lack of interest)
You know what instead of continuing to telling you what I know and what I have studied why don't you just do the research for yourself. The Library of Congress and MIt database both have pretty extensive online libraries on almost any topic you would like to research. Why don't you do that.
|
I know of extensive research methods and I have taken a few courses in similarity that you have taken. So you state that you have mentioned two books, that's great. What I am implying is that in almost everyone of your posts I've read "fact this, fact that" or "prove me wrong." If you want your argument to be more believable, simply state how you came to your conclusions and how you found your facts? If you can't do that, it's theory, until you prove it, there is nothing to prove you wrong about there, any scholar would know that, any scholar would cite something that was used as a fact or data in an agrument, just like in any other college level class, agreed?
As for me having something to say, if you have the ability to say something, for the sake of argument, I have the same ability, agreed yet again? It seems as though you would be the one with more to say, considering you started this thread to inform some of us about your organization (which I applaud in so many ways) yet, you also state that you aren't like a GLO, but your org holds many similarities with other GLOs. If these similarities are stolen or not, how do you differentiate if you are "using" some of these similarities?
Stolen or not, your org holds some of the similarities that are used by many other glos, masons, and service orgs as well. To me, that would put your org in the same category.