Quote:
Originally Posted by carnation
I seriously doubt that any NPC group was founded with an eye to keeping blacks out. I'm betting it never crossed their minds They probably just wanted to be friends.
|
Except for the part where many NPC groups had explicit WASP clauses not allowing Jews, blacks, etc., right? It never crossed their minds, except when they created those membership standards?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartofsec
Could you give me the Cliffs Notes for your "sandbox" post too?
I guess there is also great irony and cliché in your dodge.
It's a serious question -- what should NPC chapters be striving to say or do that wouldn't be considered "cliché?"
|
If NPC chapters want more women of color, they should be encouraging more women of color to participate in recruitment. There are many, many, many ways this could be done. For example, the local alumnae panhellenics could reach out to high school affinity groups (black students union and so on) to include them in the pre-rush activities. You better believe, at the schools where recs are required, women of color are going to have a MUCH harder time finding them than do white women.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriDeltaSallie
Here's another example that left me dumbfounded.
An AA homeschooling mom was annoyed that I shared the post because it was a judgmental article and what good does it do to introduce race into the topic of homeschooling?
Are you kidding me?
|
You should not assume that a single member of a group is authorized to speak for that entire group. That's pretty much the definition of tokenizing.