Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartofsec
Oh keep your shorts on.  I'll change "educational" law to "administrative" law, and "liability" to "expose one's district to potential repercussions" if you like.
I'm really not that invested in being correct about the participation of the high school guidance counselor -- it doesn't seem necessary if the info needed for recruitment is on the transcript. Subjective opinions, particularly negative judgements or predictions made by the guidance counselor, may be another matter.
I think you may just be determined to split hairs and wave around a law degree. 
Which might be handy for your guidance counselor friends in the event sorority alums come calling and ask for information on a list of female seniors (unsolicited by the female seniors, and without their knowledge or consent).
. |
You may not be invested in being correct, but you sure act like it. You shouldn't throw around terms and laws and procedures if you don't have even a layman's understanding of them. And there's no need to launch into personal attacks.
I'm not splitting hairs. I'm calling you out because you have no idea what you're talking about, and you insist you backtracking or changing the scenario to attempt to make yourself right.
TL;DR: You made an incorrect assertion.