Hmmm. That's not something that I considered even being a possibility. That's really a shame. Why wouldn't GL be up front from the beginning? However, I can see why at the same time.
Since I accepted the Philanthropy Chair, and I believe in the group under its own merits and doings as a campus org, I'd love to remain and continue participating.
I don't want to start a fight: but do you guys think that I should bring up these points to the membership at an upcoming meeting.....or let things go on?
This is a fantastic group of ladies and they are doing a fabulous job as an org just being itself....and that may attract even a larger membership. However, a situation where people say "WTH? I thought that we'd become XYZ...this sucks!" and jump ship for Circle K or another campus org, leaving no org in its place would be a mess, I think.
Then again....our campus has over 200 organizations anyway....so, lack of choice isn't an issue.
