[AOII Angel]

Originally Posted by DeltaBetaBaby

It actually cuts the other way, too. If your students come in performing at a very high level, there is very little room to show improvement. Further, 70% of CPS teachers teach subjects that are not tested, so their pay would be based on the school's performance, per the board's original proposal.

Also, one of the big issues for students from low-income families is summer retention. So, if you compare a student's performance year-over-year, it is not the same as comparing a student's performance at the beginning and end of the school year.

This makes no sense.