|
Maybe Kevin doesn't mean "ranking" literally, because I agree with him.
I think all GLOs could stand to view each other's progress in a neutral, meaningful way. Maybe not in a strict ranking, but maybe a chart. We all know that all the smillions of NIC organizations are not true "peer" organizations, but I think it's wiser to compare organizations against each other rather than internal metrics all the time.
Or look at it this way:
Executive leadership and volunteers could make use of GOOD data.
|