View Single Post
  #4  
Old 08-07-2012, 05:01 PM
DrPhil DrPhil is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
I do think that facts and actions can be looked at in a vacuum.
I completely understand and agree to some extent. Many attorneys, judges, and others involved in the criminal justice and legal realms say this. That is often considered intentionally surface-level as to only focus on legal factors. However, it is also considered extremely difficult and some would argue impossible considering this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
Of course, when I do something like counsel a black client on taking a plea vs. trial, I'm not an idiot. Race is going to be a factor whether he's innocent or guilty.

The challenge attorneys have to overcome is to not make that recommendation because of our own prejudices, but to be realistic about the sort of jury you're going to pick, i.e., likely to be all white folks with driver's licenses who were unresourceful enough not to get out of jury duty.
The legal factors are what they are but most remain correlated with extralegal factors. Attorneys, judges, jurors, etc can attempt to control for extralegal factors (hence some studies consistently finding minimal variation in legal outcomes for the same offense across race and socioeconomic status) but only within reason.

Last edited by DrPhil; 08-07-2012 at 05:04 PM.
Reply With Quote