Quote:
Originally Posted by Iota Man
LOL @ the irony in this shit.
Depends on the authority. Your post suggest that you also support this shit:
Dude was "breaking the law" and going against "authority".
http://youtu.be/ifCN7ezlDQg
They were "breaking the law" too.
http://youtu.be/o54n7HXwOhc
Dude "broke the law" by whistling at a white girl.
http://youtu.be/OMdSYxZqIXc
She "broke the law".
http://youtu.be/15p5HB-FpjI
It was the law then, so if you were around then since it's "breaking the law" and going "against authority", then you support that too. What your dumb, racist ass doesn't understand is times change, but people do not. It's the same shit, different day, you idiot.
LOL says the dumbass accusing DrPhil of calling him a racist. She never even suggested it.
Anybody seen my pom poms? Damn, I forgot, I shoved them up David Duke's ass. |
Aha, the construction of law abiding behavior and authority. Well played.
I disagree with the bolded and underlined and your spelling of "KKKevin".
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kevin
So you're going to compare a 12 year old who interfered in her drug trafficking convicted parent who was shopping at Victoria's Secret instead of paying outstanding traffic citations to Rosa Parks? Are you trying to suggest this was some sort of symbolic act of civil disobedience?
Huge fail. Epic.
|
No, Iota Man gave a general response to your failed assumption and your failed attempt at a general conclusion.
Huge success. Epic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
We've hashed that one out already. Apparently I can't get off of page 1....
|
You apparently could not get over it but now you know your interpretation was overwhelmingly a figment of your imagination.
In contrast, what you said in that other thread was not a figment of our imagination, it was interpeted exactly how you intended, and it remains applicable.