Quote:
Originally Posted by sigmadiva
Depends on what the 12 year old was doing.
If it is a kid at the play ground, and this kid gets in a shoving match with another kid, then no, the aggressor of the shoving match should not get tased.
If this same kid escalates the incident and brings a gun to the park with the intent to use it, then the least the cop should do is tase the kid to stop him or her from trying to use deadly force.
That is what I mean by "depends", it just depends on the nature of the situation.
|
But if it depends, then why did you say "Should a 12 year old child get tased? No?" That's the part that confuses me?
Quote:
|
Then if this is the actual point to this thread, then we are debating an issue that has as many answers as people you can ask. In other words, it can be "infinite".
|
Seems pretty simple to me: If your local police department was going to review its policies concerning tasing or adopt new policies, what do you think the official policies should be:
- There are no circumstances under which a 12-year-old should be tased;
- A 12-year-old should not be tased unless the police officer first determines [list criteria here] and gives a clear warning;
- It should be left to a police officer's discretion to determine whether, under the cirsumstances, a 12-year-old should be tased; or
- Some other option.