|
IP law
I'm a law student, but not an intellectual property expert. But here's my interpretation of the question:
If the ritual book is copyrighted material, then its unauthorized use can (in theory) be stopped. It isn't a criminal matter, it's a civil matter, which means somebody would have to sue the web publisher. Unless you could show some kind of harm, you wouldn't be able to collect more than nominal damages even if you won, so the litigation costs would just be out of pocket.
If the host was profiting from the site in some way, that's a different story; you could sue for a share of his profits. The trouble is that the real harm here, of course, isn't financial; it's an invasion of privacy. But the site host will argue that this site is "fair use" of the material because he's printing this in order to further a social or political agenda. If a court buys this argument, then it will be reluctant to stifle political debate unless it sees a concrete harm.
In order to get damages and cover attorneys' fees, you could allege some kind of tort, like defamation of your organization, but that would be really, really tough; since a national fraternity is a public figure, you'd have to prove that they either knew the information was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity. There is essentially no way to stop someone from publishing their _opinions_ of a public figure, no matter how damaging they may be.
If they are using fraternity IMAGES on the site, it's much easier to get an injunction to stop it. That being said, the practical realities
of any of these choices make stopping the sites almost impossible. They can buy a new domain every so often, use fake names, an offshore web company, etc...
So the short answer is, there are laws to stop this kind of thing, but they were designed before the Internet age, and any attempt to get it down would be expensive, time-consuming, and not certain to succeed.
IvySpice
|