Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
Not sure how it has doubled...
That said, this is why it is very important to have advisers who are in touch with what is going on in the chapter. It's smart to keep at least some very young alumni as part of your advisory contingent so you can know what's really going on in the chapter.
I'll bet many of these claims could have been headed off by a strong advisory board helping the chapter to make risk-averse decisions. Left to their own devices, young men and women are unlikely to see the big picture.
|
Kevin: That letter is from one and only one National Office. Do a search on any search engine under "hazing" and then perhaps under "college" "hazing". And then do a search using your own letters or Name.
What I am getting at is that I would just about be willing to bet that, sadly, every GLO National could write the very same letter. And perhaps have.
Goes way beyond having a strong advisory board. And one would only have to look at the link I posted today in the Dartmouth hazing thread.