[AXOmom]

This is in response to several previous posts so it is long. I apologize for that. As much as I detest conflict- even mild internet conflict- I feel compelled to defend this dad for some reason, so even though this might get many tarred and feathered by several posters simultaneously, here it goes.


I want to state again that as a parent I would not have handled this in the same way this dad does. I would make different decisions, but that being said I still disagree with the assertion his actions make him a nutcase. I just don’t see the evidence for that.


While I don’t think putting it on facebook was a great judgment call, I don’t think it makes him a hypocrite in the strict sense of the word. If with no reason he had told her not to use facebook in that manner, but she had discovered he was using it in that matter, I would agree, but if she chose to do it despite his warnings not to - well, she opened the door and he has a right to defend himself in the same forum she used to slander him, his wife, and her mom. Personally, I would just take the computer and know that kids say stupid things about their parents all the time (which doesn’t excuse it), but I do understand his logic which was, “I’ve warned you that this isn’t an appropriate place to air your beefs with us, but if that’s what you want to do, then we’ll handle our issues your way and see how that works out.” He also stated he wanted her friends who thought her behavior was funny to realize why it might not be all that funny if their parents chose this same course of action.


He states that he believes if children misbehave in public places, they should be prepared to face the consequences in public places. Interestingly, we recently had a speaker come to our school who worked for the regional educational district. She discussed bullying and harassment issues. She was talking about bullying but wasn’t necessarily limiting it to this when she told us that if children commit certain behaviors in public they need to be called out on them in public. She pointed out that sometimes dealing with a discipline issue privately is not always the best course of action.
*****
To be specific there is a difference between saying you don’t want all this media attention and you didn’t expect all this media attention. Everything I’ve read on his facebook page indicates the latter not the former. Granted, that may also be BS or stupidity, but he isn’t (at least that I see) crying about being hounded by the media, the public, or social services. He indicates that once this went viral he understands why that followed. He also stated that he thinks that fact is one of the best things his daughter learned from this – what you put on a public forum has long term-consequences. If he wants to capitalize on it, he hasn’t done so to date, but I realize that could change in a moment.
****
He did create the video and put it on Youtube because he said it was easier to link to her facebook which he stated was the only place he ever intended it to be seen (not because he wasn’t aware it could be seen on YouTube - he indicated it didn’t occur to him anyone else would be interested and yes, again, that could be BS or stupidity on his part). His own facebook looks like it goes back to 2007, so he didn’t create a facebook page for this that I can tell unless there is another one that hasn’t been linked on here.
*****
Whether or not he knows how to discipline her I don't think anyone could say with much validity. I haven’t seen anything yet from teachers, friends, or relatives that mentions what this girl's behavior is like on a daily basis. He has an ex-wife who hasn’t stepped up to describe him as abusive, ineffective, uncommunicative, controlling or difficult. No one from their community has commented on his parenting skills one way or another so far.


The only thing the video states is that she had done something similar in the past, he had grounded her for 3 months, and warned her if it happened again the next consequence would be worse. On his facebook he states that after he put it up and all of this happened they talked for a while about it and made their peace. Don’t know whether that’s the case or his spin. It doesn’t sound like they had unreasonable expectations of her or there was anything to indicate it was a violent or abusive household. He simply took her computer away. That in and of itself doesn’t sound like a parent who doesn’t know how to discipline. So far those sound like reasonable disciplinary decisions a lot of parents would make.


The disagreement begins with how he got rid of the computer and his decision to post his issues with her on facebook. Those seem less about discipline than judgment. The latter might be seen as a discipline issue, but I don’t know that one poor decision on his part qualifies as evidence of an inability to discipline your child over the long haul.
*****
As to the concern about safety- he’s in an open field shooting into the ground with a 45 and the only cars and buildings are quite a ways off. The only one at risk is him.


Other than the safety issue which seems fairly unlikely and the reality that the computer could be better used, I don’t see why the fact that he shot the computer in and of itself is an issue. Is shooting an inanimate object worse than slamming it to the ground or smashing it with a hammer? If the intention is to destroy it is one method of doing that preferable to another? Why is it any worse or more a sign of instability than shooting a deer?


I could understand if he stormed into his daughter’s room, ripped the computer out of the wall, threw it into the backyard and started shooting because then we’ve got an impulsive guy with a gun who has some anger management issues, but this guy waited a full day after he found that entry, talked to his wife and ex-wife about it, thought about his response, set up the video, recorded his response, and calmly shot the computer which seems silly but not dangerous. He wasn’t raging or out of control.
******
As far as the indicators of abuse go - having spent a lot of time working in a juvenile correctional facility with real victims of abuse – truly horrifying abuse - let me just say I’m really bothered by any attempt to equate this with what the kids I worked with went through.


First off, in the context of abuse displaying a weapon means using it or showing it to threaten the victim in some way or suggest that they should feel threatened. Owning a gun and using it on inanimate objects doesn’t mean you're displaying a weapon or threatening family members with it. I lived in an area (several actually) where people lived on large pieces of property and shot weapons at inanimate things all the time for the heck of it. It wouldn’t float my boat, but as long as they were obeying safety laws and sticking to inanimate objects, I didn’t assume they were abusive people solely because they did this. If we follow that logic then most hunters must also be serial killers because serial killers usually start off killing and torturing animals.


If anything, the fact that his daughter wrote this diatribe on facebook would indicate the opposite. None of the abused kids I knew would do that. They had bigger issues than chores and they weren’t that stupid. Writing that would have gotten them beaten or killed.


This wasn’t her property – it was his. He paid for it.


Maybe it’s just my skewed perspective but I would rate this low on the humiliation scale. When your dad holds a gun to your head, stands you outside on a porch, and asks passing migrant farm workers if they want to buy you for $25 (happened to one of my students) THAT’S humiliation. This is just embarrassing. That happens and kids live through it. I'm sure what she said about him and her mother and step-mother was pretty embarrasing for them to - would that make her the abuser and them the victims?


I’m not sure a parent looking at his 15 year old daughter’s facebook page qualifies as controlling or monitoring, but for the record, he saw it only because he was installing some pretty expensive equipment on it that she asked for. In addition, he’s in IT, so you would think it would occur to her that it was at least possible (parents being parents) they would see this.
******
As to the two last posts – I’ll refer back to our recent school seminar on bullying – another “normal” teenage behavior as old as the hills that has now similarly moved into social media. Sometimes the bulliers are also A students who aren’t doing drugs or getting in any other type of obvious trouble. I have one of those right now. Does it follow that if we confront a parent with this child’s behavior, they can respond by saying, “Hey everyone does this at some point. It isn’t like she’s doing drugs and besides, she’s 15, there’s nothing I can do about it now. She is what she is and I don’t want to be too controlling.”?


Yes, there are worse things kids can do than say disrespectful things about their parents. My children could have done much worse things than the things they did do and I’m grateful they didn’t, but this doesn’t mean I didn’t give them consequences for the bad decisions they made using the logic it could have been much worse. Normal teenage behavior isn’t always necessarily equivalent to acceptable teenage behavior.


I don’t know that I agree that if you haven’t taught them right by now (age 15) you won’t be able to control their behavior. I’ve seen kids put into placements where the environment was structured and the rules and consequences were clear, consistent, and fair who did change after age 15 and change significantly. I would agree that it is a much tougher and harder row to hoe.


As was pointed out - she isn't pregnant, doing drugs, or committing crimes, so dad must have been raising her right for the most part, but it doesn't follow that a child who is raised right will make perfect decisions after age 15 or should never expect a parent to enact consequences for the poor ones they probably will make. It also doesn't follow (at least to me) that a parent who does enact consequence for those decisions is trying to control their child.