Quote:
Originally Posted by Always AlphaGam
I don't get the part in bold. They had a strong reputation despite the hazing? Geez.
|
I think it depends on what the hazing actually is, and who is calling it that. From what I found online, it seems that in 2009 the "Student Conduct Board" are the ones who found them guilty of hazing, not their national HQ. It appears their national HQ does not agree with the university's assessment and the chapter is still active, just not recognized. Methinks there's some politics going on here.