Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
Ghostwriter's insinuation was insulting....
|
It allowed Ghostwriter to show his true colors (there is no pun here). True colors are best shown when people are not consciously trying to convince themselves and others of untruths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
ETA: I wonder if that question would have been asked if Gamma Phi Beta and Alpha Phi (for example) joined forces to encourage votes for Senator Clinton over Sarah Palin.
|
Yes because women are also a power minority.
Women are emotional, irrational, illogical, and menstruating creatures. Multiply that by a million when it comes to sociopolitical concerns. Hilary Clinton and Sarah Palin** would confuse women and anger men. The bolded is sarcasm, of course, this is fun.
** Sarah Palin is about as viable a candidate as Herman Cain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by amIblue?
You silly, easily confused Black folks.  |
We can't help it!
The Black women on Cain's camp were playing on that ignorance. They went on every political show talking about President Obama running again Cain would be an exciting, monumental moment because people could not use race and instead had to make decisions based on political platforms.