Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
I see what you mean. Considering the relatively lower number of HBCUs, and active NPHC chapters at HBCUs, there is a higher risk of revoking charters at HBCUs than at PWIs. In a non-fatal hazing incident, HBCU administrations that have good relationships with the NPHC regional/district, local, and/or national bodies often work with the organizations to find the best course of action. This is a negotiation process where the HBCU often tries to see what the NPHC org has in mind but the ultimate decision is on the HBCU. Many NPHCers at the graduate and collegiate levels think it is stupid to revoke charters for certain hazing incidents, especially when you can simply put a chapter on suspension until all the idiot current members graduate. Punishing members and putting chapters on suspension for a few years (or having the chapter's membership intake taken over by the graduate chapter) usually works. HBCUs often know that whereas the PWIs that I attended appeared not give a damn.
Which brings me to my next point: This is not what you were saying but some may take your post to imply that HBCUs are therefore more tolerant of hazing as part of HBCU culture. That is problematic because it operates under the assumption that how PWIs (and NPC and NIC) do it is the standard and anything different than that standard is deficient. Different is not deficient. I believe that forms of hazing are accepted at many, if not most, colleges and universities as part of the campus cultures. There were forms of hazing for non-Greeks and Greeks at the PWIs that I attended that were not challenged until after someone got hurt or killed. The PWIs that I attended were more lenient on the NPCs and NICs because how they operated was "familiar" and "normal" whereas NPHC GLOs could get in trouble for darn near everything. It is wonderful that we had regional and national bodies to assist us because, being the minority, all eyes were often on us for the smallest things. Cultural practices that even our national bodies approved of were questioned by the PWIs to the point where we started getting approval to hold events off campus.
|
I think we agree that the differences between HWI/PWIs and HBCUs cause a difference in the likelihood of a charter being completely nuked since the NPHC fraternity or sorority has additional options leading to, perhaps, a more nuanced approach. Also, NIC housing corporation is unlikely to keep a house for the possibility of returning to campus in 5 years (unless they can rent it to another Fraternity), and as I indicated before, unless you are looking at one of the largest Universities, there is always another NIC fraternity that can replace it.
The concept of what is familiar leads back to the discussion that has been had *many* times here as to how NIC hazing is different than NPHC hazing. I don't know if you can really compare an NIC fraternity putting a pledge in the hospital for 3 days with alcohol poisoning with putting an NPHC fraternity a pledge in the hospital for 3 days with necrotic tissue on the legs and buttocks. However administrators at all schools have to do so, and the question of whether those who hazed were themselves drunk at the time is brought up. (and one fits nicely into the legal definition of assault and the other doesn't)
I agree with the familiar issue. NIC fraternity getting the pledges put on the musical Oklahoma (I can't think of a musical less NPHC oriented), is just fine, having an NPHC fraternity getting the pledges to do probate show, not. (Note, could someone from an NPHC fraternity or sorority *please* create a Wikipedia entry for a Probate show) And trying to explain the concept of a Plot...