Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
A very understandable sentiment that those who have other agendas will capitalize on. After all, who can argue with insuring the integrity of the vote?
|
Not only claiming to insure the integrity of the vote but using "common sense" as a framework. It is difficult to debate "common sense" and tautology. It leads to redundancy and questions that become rhetorical because they will never get answered.
/this isn't about SWTXBelle since she is not the first supporter of this to claim this approach makes sense just because it makes sense.