Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
Everyone is piling on JoePa because of his position.
|
Yes, people in positions of power will be expected to do more. Such is life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
I haven't seen anything about Second Mile allowing Sandusky to interact with children until 2008.
|
If they knew and allowed him to interact with children until 2008, they are also to blame. Those are legal and moral dynamics that Second Mile will have to work through as it pertains to their founder.
A March 2011 article:
http://www.ydr.com/sports/ci_17744809
There is plenty of accountability and legal or moral dynamics to go around. This is not about either/or.
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
I have seen few articles addressing the fact that the police and child welfare were aware of the 1998 event. Why weren't there any charges filed at that point? Why wasn't a caseworker tasked with following up with Sandusky after that?
|
But, you have seen articles, right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
Most of what I've seen has said that JoePa should have taken this a step further by banning Sandusky from campus. Yes, football is a big deal, but that's not his job. The person whose job it is (Schultz) HAS been charged.
|
That is good. People are saying that it
seems as though JoePa handed it off to Schultz when these types of things are difficult to hand off (no pun intended) and
seemingly keep moving.