|
damnit I swear I'm reading everything, now twice... I don't see what you're trying to prove. I can't speak for Tom, but i don't think it takes a genius to understand the definition of words here other than Racism, which is what was being debated, IMO.
If you want Farrakhan (sp?) included in the discussion, that's fine. But the man is brought up not as a topic but an example of racism (er anti-semetism more specifically). But he's not the big problem, getting through this simple problem of understanding what racism is and who is responsible for it should be settled first.
- RUgreek
|