I feel calling folks out would be counter-productive. I said I wasn't going to do it in my first reply, and I'm not. But if I did, there would be Deltas and AKAs and Zetas and SGRhos on the list. I don't discriminate.
This is just a dialogue to find out WHY there is such hostility around here and WHY people feel uncomfortable on some boards. We're not here to discuss particular incidents or to avoid the original question.
I just think it's funny for there to be an important message for folks not to reply & stoop to the level of others but retaliation threads are created after that. And if it's "ONLY GC...it's cyberspace
" why bother with doing either? Why waste energy responding to the ramblings of people in cyberspace who are not worth it?
I'm not referring to one incident or one organization, but the one you're talking about is included. All I know is what was posted on both sides AND that before the forum software was changed, it was possible for a moderator to edit a signature. I'm not saying it was done, just saying it was possible. If the tables were turned, I know the issue would have been resolved shortly after it happened. It appears to me that it hasn't and it is still a sore spot. Whether y'all want to sort that out is not for me to decide. But if it's the
principle you're concerned with, I would think all parties involved would discuss it with each other rather than making remarks to their own sorors.
I don't think we are pretending that we're SOOO removed from this. If we were removed from it, there wouldn't be an issue to discuss becasue it wouldn't be OUR problem. N'est pas?