Quote:
Originally posted by neicy81
Regarding reading comprehension and "lack of substantial evidence", if you go back and read again, that was thrown in because I thought a user was under the assumption that I if I hate people, I would actually kill them. What facts or evidence do I need for that?Secondly, when did I question your comprehension?
Regarding actual facts, I believe I posted many of comments in a general way. For example, the history books and everything wrong with it.I stated general examples but just didn't go into an in depth 2 page long paragraph.
|
I see where you are coming from. I don't think that person ACTUALLY believed you would kill someone, I am sure they were referring more to the banality of your statement. You did not directly question my comprehension. I was just trying to let you know that I have thoroughly read each post in this thread.
You strike me as someone who has just come across the information that racism, by definition, can not be carried out by an oppressed people, thereby making it difficult for you to formulate an intricate arument to back up your initial claims. Understand that I do agree with you, that is why I am trying to steer you in a direction that might make others more susceptible to what you are trying to say. When you end each post with a rude directive, it makes everything that came before it seem meaningless.
I think that in order to effectively get your point across, a two paragraph post may be necessary. When it comes to a subject of this magnitude, one must choose their words carefully. It is very doubtful that you will change anyone's opinion, or that they will change yours, but you never know how many people may benefit from seeing things from a different perspective. This can only be accomplished through educated reasoning, and this may in fact call for a more verbose post.