|
Right but it seems like what they're doing is suspending formal social functions (planned on a chapter level) between their chapters and the one they're banning - they're not saying that chapter can't have parties until they fix it, they're not saying their individual members can't continue to socialize - just that they won't be having parties until it's fixed.
I fail to see how that's such an issue for people. It's not even social probation like IFC probably hands out. It's mixer probation, basically. They're not really actively policing fraternities - they're encouraging fraternities to police themselves by making an active choice about their standards for officially mixing with a group.
|