[OneHeartOneWay]

From the article (emphasis added): "The sorority presidents’ Wednesday decision was influenced by the public act of violence that occurred at the fraternity in question on Saturday, Levin said. The fraternity had not informed the sorority presidents of any actions taken against the male student since the incident, according to Levin."

I appreciate the symbolic nature of sororities uniting together; however, this bolded part really bothers me. A GLO should never "inform" sorority [or fraternity] presidents of internal investigations or sanctions. This is a slippery slope with which I am not comfortable, not only from a PR and internal governance perspective, but potentially from a legal one as well. And, what are the sororities going to do if they don't agree with the results or sanctions (or lack thereof) of the internal investigation? It turns it from an internal investigation into a Greek community one...