|
Congrats on ZTA!
I find it odd that ranking was performed the way it was - I don't recall any system having PNMs rank the bottom three or bottom two. I guess listing sororities 1-12 as #1, with numbers 13, 14, and 15 ending up as #2,3 and 4 is ultimately the same as ranking only your bottom three, but it seems so negative. Instead of PNMs focusing on the positive attributes of the groups, they're forced to think of the groups in terms of their negative aspects (or lump the groups into 'least favorites' instead of 'favorites'). It just seems to put the PNMs in the wrong mind-set. Maybe it's just me. Is this kind of ranking a new trend?
__________________
Never let the facts stand in the way of a good answer. -Tom Magliozzi
|