[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by dnall

First of all... Unless I'm mistaken, at no time other than examples have I mentioned fraternity expansion. I said national GLO expansion. AND, when I said it, I ONLY said there are SOME ASPECTS of that process helpful to this situation - specifically, the initial blitz recruiting methods.

You're using national GLO expansion as your basis here. These are not national GLOs.

In no other way does anything I've said have anything to do with any type of greek org, be it NIC, NPC, NPHC, local, co-ed, or freakin green martians. This is broad organizational dynamics.

Except the assumptions you're making are based on national GLOs. (And specifically the type YOU are used to.)

Second... I don't think it's possible to recruit 5 "solid members." No matter what their capabilities or what they say, there is not depth of dedication. They aren't invested by having been around, & haven't come through a training process with an established org under functional leadership that produces religious commitment. So, no matter who or how many people you recruit, a big chunk of them will not be around by Aug.

This is not necessarily true. Entire NPHC chapters may consist of 5 people. IFC fraternities can also be smaller and not dying. Your perception is again, based on a specific type of national model. Five solid members means five solid members.

The people that are committed... they have a tremendous amount of work ahead to get this group to stand-alone self-sustaining, refocused on their purpose, and doing something in the direction of their mission. Whatever "good members" you do get, you're going to burn them out fast because there's just not enough people to do the work.

Again, you're only going to burn them out if a) you insist on recruiting 20 people or b) you're assuming the level of workload of a specific type of national chapter. What exactly is going to cause burnout?

I'm not saying 20 because most national GLOs target that number as an initial foundation, and they don't target that number because everybody's doin it. I'm saying that number because it's about the minimum that can endure the attrition and do the work while still recruiting fresh meat to the grinder.

And this is why we're saying you've got it wrong here. This is not a national GLO it does not have the work of a national GLO there doesn't have to be a meat grinder process. (And yes, national GLOs frequently do target a number based on what everyone else is doing). Additionally this is NOT the number a typical NPC sorority looks for and NPHC/MCGLO orgs aren't even on your radar. It's pretty obvious you're basing this on your experience with national fraternities at the school(s) you're familiar with.

Yes, setting a higher goal is formidable. The task of refloating this org is a hundred times harder. The odds against this org are very very steep already. I don't think the pressure of recruiting 20 versus 5 people makes a whole lot of difference in that equation. If they aren't all in against the odds, they're already done.

It's not about whether it's formidable or not.

Just in case you didn't know "Stay in your lane" means you're giving advice that's inappropriate to the situation. All of us, as greeks, are generally capable of providing general advice to other greeks or people who want to be greek. But sometimes we're inexperienced in the ways of other organizations. In those cases we're told to 'stay in our lane' or sometimes 'shut up.' It's not personal, but it means you're providing BAD ADVICE. Instead of insisting how right your advice actually is, how about you take a step back and think that maybe, just maybe, people with experience working with small local organizations might know what the hell they're talking about? And that people who have been in sororities know better than you how many people a sorority expansion looks for?