[miss priss]

As I peruse thru the many opinions written about Kelly I ponder the question is a man guilty when he is misled? I teach 13-14+ year olds ;many of which look older than I do! I have seen girls actually flirting with the men in my building (and getting rejection but they still persist might I add). They wear halter tops, tight skirts, daisy dukes...you name it they wear it. Keep in mind they bring extra clothing to school to change without the parents knowledge. Some parents mind you don't care and buy the clothes for them! I digress..... I feel that some men are doomed from the beginning. Some tell them no and some of the girls are so trifling that they lie just to get even. Others truly don't know these girls ages. You have your dirty old men but let's keep it real. If a man asks how old are you and you say 18 and you look like you are 18 some men are not smart enough to conversate first then get the "draws" second. I digress..... In his case, I think it is a case of revenge. C'mon suing for $50,000? Does that really make sense? Where were the parents when this child dropped her panties? Where is the moral value of teaching a girl how to be a lady? I didn't hear of her resisting any sexual advances either? We have a lot of GROWN women caught up with the idea of "I slept with a celebrity" so what makes us think that this girl or any cheez-chaser is any different. I am not saying he doesn't have a fetish for young girls,I'm saying that with his popularity comes the price of fame. Whatcha think?