Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
The fact of the matter is that you made a cliche' white privilege statement that implies that you have the power to engage in a topic that references race without being accused of being interested in and perceivably obsessed with race.
|
Yawn. I made no statements to suggest an obsession that and your logic (which includes stereotyping and generalizations) is faulty at best and at worst, racist.
Quote:
|
You just happened to use me as an illustration because, although I don't give a shit about your username, you consistently care about mine.
|
How do I care about your username?
Quote:
|
Oh praise Jesus for white people who say stupid things like "race baiting" and "race card." The most amusing part is that I was only responding to Elephant Walk's and knight_shadow's posts. I swear we'd all go to Race Hell if white people like Elephant Walk weren't here to announce when the race-correlated discussion is over.
|
I didn't announce it. Goodness you are quite dense. I personally have no interest in debating it, but you usually do due to your illogical backwards theories. If you have interest in it, go ahead. I have no interest in participating. Economics are interesting, your ridiculous conception of race is not.
Quote:
|
Time to pretend it was always only an economic discussion.
|
It was. The entire conversation was about comparative advantage.
__________________
Overall, though, it's the bigness of the car that counts the most. Because when something bad happens in a really big car – accidentally speeding through the middle of a gang of unruly young people who have been taunting you in a drive-in restaurant, for instance – it happens very far away – way out at the end of your fenders. It's like a civil war in Africa; you know, it doesn't really concern you too much. - P.J. O'Rourke
Last edited by Elephant Walk; 10-12-2010 at 12:33 PM.
|