Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
This has literally no effect on whether anything worthy of compensation has happened, or whether/not the guy is right. There's no "golden anniversary" judicial exception.
If we take his accusations at face value, there's no need for a judicial process. Come on.
Why do you assume [his allegations are true]? Apparently your innocuous "for discussion" question had a motive, huh?
Right, because you took his claims (WHICH AREN'T OUTLINED IN YOUR INITIAL ARTICLE) at face value. Also, everyone who files suit deserves compensation, right? Oh wait.
Someone has to [proofread the OP's blog].
You seem to have an agenda that wasn't initially disclosed . . . any conjecture on that?
|
You win at lawyering today. Er . . . you won yesterday.