Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl
OK, please explain why Barbie is teh devil but Sex and the City is OK? They're just giant Barbie dolls, and they're slutty Barbies at that.
Or why is Victoria's Secret OK and Barbie is not? VS doesn't exactly give out an "empowering women" theme - it's all about looking sexy for men.
As far as it being "childish" this is the generation running around with all things Hello Kitty (past age 7) so I don't think that argument holds water.
I don't think it's the most fantastic theme either, I just don't understand the vitriol for it when similar things are apparently OK fine.
|
outsider's opinion/
Barbie = SATC = VS = not good themes
But, as Drolefile stated, you can pick things from these categories and make a theme out of them. I just wouldn't call it Barbie, SATC, or VS. Seeing those titles would make me cringe as a nonmember, not like what would make me cringe matters.
On a Delta note, some chapter advisers and alumnae chapters would trip if a collegiate chapter used any of those themes for a program, etc but they would be more understanding if the theme was to take a FUN women's liberation approach to Barbie, SATC, or VS. That's something that has previously been done by researchers and so forth.
/outsider's opinion