
06-13-2010, 07:24 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 2,180
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
General statement:
I don't think it's wise for Greeks (regardless of the council and conference) to assume and therefore tell aspirants this. We only know what will happen in the (collegiate or alumnae) chapters that we are involved in.
And I don't think it's true that (again, across council and conference) the collegiate chapters (and football teams, etc.) that haze are in the minority. Many GLOs' policies generally operate under a broad definition of hazing as to capture all sorts of "unofficial rites of passage" that members can come up with.
PNMs/aspirants who are grown and mature enough to pursue membership can also accept such honesty and potential for harsh reality.
|
"As of February 12, 2010, the number of recorded hazing/pledging/rushing-related deaths in fraternities and sororities stands at 96 - 90 males and 6 females. *"
Since the OP specifically referred to death and other extreme measures of hazing, this is an important statistic to consider. I have not found a reputable link that gives a current statistic on specifically Greek hazing incidents, but hazingprevention.org, where my statistic came from, says that 55% of students in college have been hazed...in a club/athletic team/other organization. So since by this definition we all had over a 50% chance of being hazed regardless of the organization we joined, I stand by my statement that worrying about dying or being severely mentally/emotionally/physically shouldn't be a deterrent in deciding to rush. For someone that appears to be as aware of, and against, hazing as the OP seems to be, it stands to reason that they would be able to recognize hazing if it occurred, remove themselves from the situation, and hopefully follow through by reporting the hazing.
__________________
IIII IIII IIII
"A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five."
Groucho Marx
|