There were more Snapple ads. I'm sure the Boy Band Snapple ad wasn't found funny by guys performing in a group comprised of males vocalists. I'm sure some girl was raped, impregnated, or both at some unsupervised party, somewhere. The two snapple bottles peeking into the girl's locker room showers wasn't funny to some people affected by a peeping tom invading their privacy. However, all of these scenes are understood by the general public, on an unspoken level, as comedy. As funny situations we've seen in replicated in several movies, despite any "similarities to real life situations and people." You can't force censorship because you are offended. There are no true repercussions to these Snapple ads. I would think that all impressions left on viewers of the ads are negligable, more dependant on their real contacts. Whether or not I have experience with hazing, has no bearing on CENSORSHIP.
