Thank you so much for the responses. You guys bring up some great ideas. Especially:
Quote:
Originally Posted by AOII Angel
Judges were chosen from each chapter and from random people on campus and in the community that were not associated with any of the groups on campus but were well known in our area.
The nice thing was that we had a really diverse mix of award winners with this method. It didn't end up being a big popularity contest.
|
We ESPECIALLY need the above -- thank you for that idea. And:
Quote:
Originally Posted by VandalSquirrel
As much as collegiate opinions may be valuable, it may be good to have just alumni do the scoring, though include student input in some of the categories. Maybe if the student is elected to an inter/national position and is already at a level of impartiality it could work.
I'd also make sure that chapters are looked at in a way there can be some "normalizing" of standards.
|
I am not averse to the bolded idea, either.
I'd like to add that none of the categories that we're thinking about need to be normalized (thankfully). No GPA awards or man-mile awards.