Quote:
Originally Posted by ladygreek
I do not know much about Arizona, and as neither a Dem, nor a Repub I really don't want to make a judgement based on politically, partisan arguments.
|
I am also neither a Dem nor a Repub and know that all of the naysayers are not making political, partisian arguments.
For instance, discrimination based on outcome and racial profiiling are consequences that I deducted before even reading opinion articles and without even caring about which crazy side of the aisle proposed this new law. My conclusion was based on history and trends and patterns regarding what similar laws and practices have resulted in. That has nothing to do with politics and partisanism, which are both bullcrap as far as I'm concerned. Anyone who can get their head out of the asses of politics can see how a law that makes sense in theory (because, as Soror said, despite the supposed benefits of immigration, most people don't agree with illegal immigration or even an ill-prepared influx of legal immigrants) can be the dumbest thing ever in practice.
ETA: If AZ was just trying to bring attention to the issue and the gov't to act, OKAY. There's a reason why they're making changes to this law. Another example of how intent and outcome are usually completely different.