|
33: They post was about an advisor out right saying that he didn't agree with the regluations. I am not saying that as advisors we need to say put up or shut up. What I am saying is that as advisors we need to show the regulations in a positive light in order for them to be followed and even followed with actually understanding. It would be close to impossible to think that all regualtions please 160,000+ members, but that doesn't mean that every little thing we dislike needs to be changed.
College members can complain all they wish, but on a national level the seasoned members that have been in college, been working with colleges, and have a grasp on the entire big picture are the officers that will be taken more seriously and in fact are the ones who initiate the regualtions. That in no way puts down college members, but even in a job situation, who would I take more seriously, an employee who has been with the company for years or an employee that is newer? Yes if a chapter dislikes something they can speak and be heard, that's why we have conventions and national leadership conferences...but we vote on it all and we, the voting delegates have a lot of power within our organization, but the regualtions on hazing/drinking/open parties are not organization regualtions they are NPC or US Law, nothing we can do an indiviuals will change that, we elect representatives to vote in NPC and they do what is best...
Again, me and 33 agree to disagree...good times 33!
|