Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
CG, the question is still on the table. This is a medical professional who has to treat you. He spoke out against the bill although he claims he has no real working knowledge of it (surprise there as most docs have NO idea how insurance really works) but you have to see him to have a condition treated.
Would you still go or seek treatment elsewhere?
Would you be concerned at the level of care he gives, knowing this?
My vote should never be a prerequisite for my medical treatment.
|
I would seek treatment somewhere else.
__________________
Phi Sigma Biological Sciences Honor Society “Daisies that bring you joy are better than roses that bring you sorrow. If I had my life to live over, I'd pick more Daisies!”
|