View Single Post
  #5  
Old 01-04-2010, 01:32 PM
deepimpact2 deepimpact2 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
That's why I went with Battery. With Battery, you get straight to punitives (without all those nasty medmal caps). With malpractice, since it's a negligence based claim, I'm pretty sure you have to prove damages to win.

I'm definitely not a medmal guy and don't (yet) do civil rights cases, although I'm planning on getting around to calling up the federal Bar's pro bono folks to do pro bono prisoner civil rights claims against the state.... so maybe in a couple years I'll revive this thread and wax eloquent on the requirements of 42 USC 1983, et. seq... but not today


Yeah, you do have to prove damages. She wouldn't likely be able to prove special damages (unless the bill for the tubal ligation was more than a bill would be for the IUD), but she could perhaps get general damages.
__________________
Just because I don't agree with it doesn't mean I'm afraid of it.
Reply With Quote