View Single Post
  #36  
Old 01-03-2010, 07:32 PM
33girl 33girl is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbymidwest View Post
I was kind of surprised at the change, as there are still a few chapters who consistently do not come close to 100, and that this would hurt them more.
So in other words, they did this 100 person cap for several years and it still didn't help the struggling groups? If there were multiple groups not hitting total, why didn't they just lower it in the first place?

I'm all for helping chapters that need help but apparently this method didn't work, and it's not fair to the girls who got denied a chapter they may have wanted and who wanted them because the quota system wasn't being used normally. The fact of the matter is, if you're under total you have to fix it yourself in the off semesters...so you can go into rush on an equal footing. Panhel regulations aren't going to help you.

(And yes, I know I sound like I'm contradicting myself. But membership caps are not the same as total.)
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
Reply With Quote