|
I find it hilarious (and irritating) that the original article was written by someone majoring in journalism! Personally, I don't care for biased news and she didn't bother to research into the system before, during or AFTER recruitment when writing this article. Perhaps it's just me but I find the original article to be immature, bitter, pretentious and completely unnecessary. She was foolish enough to think that it was only her choice and then makes the comment of how "If a single sorority chooses to cut you from of their list of possible new members, you will not be given a reason why" without realizing that she also didn't tell the sororities WHY she cut THEM. It's mutual and she's playing the victim.
The NPC President handled it very well, as well as anyone could have.
Quoting the first article again:
"I don't think anyone can possible get to know someone, let alone a huge group of girls, in a day or two or be able to decide that a person isn't good enough, or worthy of being in their organization. Nothing about that seems fair or right."
THAT doesn't seem right? And slandering the name of the sororities in your school newspaper does?
|