|
Since the OJ case seems to have entered this thread I'll throw in a thought or three. To me, it doesn't really matter whether he did it or not. The prosecution failed to make their case, the evidence was grossly mishandled, there were too many irregularities, etc, etc. Remember the bit about reasonable doubt? Seems like there was a fair amount of that.
Now as to my personal opinion, I have serious doubts that he did in fact do it. However, and again just my personal opinion, I have a gut feeling that he is sheilding someone and was willing to bite the bullet for that person. That would arguably hit him with accessory after the fact and/or obstruction, etc.
But, sometimes doing the technically wrong thing can be the actually right thing.
__________________
A man has to believe in something, I believe I'll have another drink.
|