Quote:
Originally Posted by I.A.S.K.
I didnt want to believe he did it either, but then I read the book. The title was "If I did it this is how I would've done it" or something like that. He definitely killed them both. He claims to have done it in a fit of rage, but still He DEFINITELY did it.
Now if he hadn't done it and only knew who did it (while I comprehend that under the law he's considered a murderer) he wouldnt be considered a murderer to me.
|
He was framed. If he did it then why was the bloody glove in the back of the house and the Bronco and a blood trail was also in front of the house? Mark Furman obviously planted the evidence.