Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid
Maybe, but it seems like the Slate article is referencing the legal definition, based on the MA statutes and case law - whether or not an organization wants to stretch that definition or challenge it in the courts is a whole other issue.
|
The part about political speech being exempt, in a way that implied completely exempt, struck me as idealistically delusional, but perhaps the issue is that you simply wouldn't be charged with disorderly conduct in particular if you incited a riot with political speech.