Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
That is my point...it was brought up and immediately brushed aside because it was 'normal' where she was from to do that sort of thing...so to me, it's a big 180 turn that now after the fact it's being discussed in depth.
Not trying to say "I told you so." but moreso that this was an issue that when it really counted no one really brought up.
Again, if the vetting committee was comfortable with it, that was their choice.
|
I guess I don't understand your point because I don't think it really counted, ever, and the people who are suggesting that it does reveal something significant didn't really consider her qualified in other respects. As near as I can tell, no one would have changed their votes based on a more timely discussion of this issue.