|
I have been hearing discussions about the implications of this ruling for affirmative action because of the precedent that it sets for the measures that organizations can take to ensure diversity. I am interested in reading the language of the ruling to see exactly what it provided for.
Seems the city messed up here; it did not do due diligence to determine whether there was a justifiable reason for dismissing the results. I am of the mind that there was something amiss at some phase in the process to create these kinds of results (along the lines of what Phil already outlined.)
Also, reverse discrimination. :neutral:
__________________
You think you know. But you have no idea.
|