[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by tri deezy

Really great editorial regarding the tea parties. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/op...20party&st=cse

I don't know, he's painting with a rather broad brush there; he's essentially keying in on the idea that Rush and the like represent the majority of the Republican party. I would tweak that, only in that I think they only represent the most vocal members of the party.

Also, saying we were just as "crazy" 10 to 15 years ago again is overstating it.

Then again...wasn't Krugman critical of the President's economic policy? Or am I thinking of someone else?