Quote:
Originally posted by carnation
Amen to Pnguintrax' response! As you know, we are dealing with the same problem here at the college where I teach. I'm sure that if a national came in and recruited and pushed its no-hazing stance, the locals would evaporate. I can not imagine any student actually wanting to be hazed.
If the national is at total and the locals keep whining with no evidence of improvement, suggest to them that since this one national is thriving beautifully and is at total, it's time to bring in another one!
|
OH yea, that would be the great thing to do, move in the nationals and "evaporate the locals." Local, regional, national or international all means the same to me, they are all greek organizations. Wouldn't it be better to try to help reform the locals and introduce a no-hazing stance instead of them being forced off campus because of incoming national orgs? That would just be one greek org pushing out another. AND we all know that just because the group is a national and they have this ever so uplifting "no-hazing" policy does not mean that they are always going to abide by anti-hazing policies
We all read the news and we all read the risk management board, nationals are just as prone to hazing as a local or regional. The proof is in the charters being lost or revoked, the lawsuits coming out due to pledges being hurt and/or killed in the pledging process, the chapters being forced to close and on and on and on.
Think about that, because nothing in this world is concrete....Nothing is static...things can fall apart.