
03-11-2009, 12:00 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 913
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by naraht
There were both *internal* and *external* reasons that the fraternity went co-ed. At the 1974 convention, before the ruling on Alpha Phi Omega and Title IX at the HEW, the vote to allow women as full brothers got a majority, just not the 2/3 needed.
|
Personally, I'm not disputing that there were other reasons behind APO going co-ed, I'm just saying what appeared to be the primary catalyst for APO being co-ed (the 1976 HEW Title IX ruling). Based on the wording of the decision to go co-ed from an original APO document, it said something to the effect of (I'm paraphrasing based on memory): "If an APO chapter needs to go co-ed, it may do so."
Quote:
The National Fraternity did not allow all male extension efforts after 1986.
|
As I said earlier, this was one of the unintended consequences that the '76 Convention could not anticipate occuring.
__________________
Diamonds Are Forever, and Nupes are For Your Eyes Only
KAY<>FNP
|