Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
I think the legality can get a little sticky. Yes, names, coats-of-arms and the like are registered trademarks, and fraternities have the ability to take action for the unauthorized use of them. That gets much more complicated, and in some cases near impossible, though, when the unauthorized use is not in the United States.
Generic symbols typically are not protected. We, for example, could not trademark a simple lyre or triangle, although a specific design of such a symbol (such as the lyre in our visual identity) can be trademarked.
As for rituals, an interesting question is raised. Will the typical fraternity try to take any kind of legal action, since doing so would require the fraternity to go into court and prove the unauthorized use of the ritual? Doing so would almost certainly require the complaining fraternity to introduce its ritual into evidence.
Which reiterates what I think may be an important factor here -- DU is not a typical fraternity where ritual is concerned. Its ritual has always been open; non-secrecy was one of the founding principles of DU. The DU can be found on their national website. I wonder if that made it an easier target for the group in the Phillipines.
I'll admit that as I've read about these orgs in the Phillipines, I've wondered, "How would we do if it were us?" Unfortunately, I think that an equally important question is "What could we do?"
|
I think Phi Beta Kappa may have it easier then in the law suit. If I remember my Fraternity history correctly, the Phi Beta Kappa ritual was revealed sometime before 1820 and as such is at about the same level of privacy as Delta Upsilon.
Symbols get tricky, what do you do if the National Organization in the Philippines doesn't officially use it, but all kinds of youtube videos and Friends pages of the Philippines group do use it (or something similar), which I *think* is the situation for SAE.
I would tend to think that lawsuits would go after the public parts of the Fraternity in the Philippines, use of symbols, claims that they are part of the USA group etc.
To me there are three questions that need to be answered about a Group in the Philippines with the same name as that of one in the United States before deciding what action to take.
1) Are members of this Group claiming to actually be members of the Fraternity in the United States?
2) If no, Are the members of this Group using symbols, songs and other related indicators of the North American Group as part of their activities
3) If the first two are no, Are the groups of the same or similar "types" in terms of limitations on their membership for example (only engineers for example).
If a group started in the Philippines called Phi Mu Alpha that was limited to only male Medical Students at the University of the Philippines College of Medicine (say as a competitor to Phi Kappa Mu (
http://www.phikappamu.com/)) and had Blue and White as their colonrs, I seriously doubt that Phi Mu Alpha -Sinfonia would sue them.
OTOH, if it this group were Phi Mu Alpha (or Sinfonia) at the University of Philippines Music and Performing Arts College limited to Music Students and had a crest with a triangle on top of a red diagonal cross on a pentagonal shield and claimed that they were part of your organization. I think Phi Mu Alpha would be *far* more concerned and might actually talk to Phi Beta Kappa to get suggestions.